Question 2: Is Facebook Good?

The reach of Facebook as a social network is online any other. The ability to form groups, communicate with others, as well as share, like and repost was truly revolutionary. Zuckerberg associate’s "connection" with his intentions for Facebook, which can be correlated with Flichy's concept of "ideology, myth and utopia." 

The goal of Facebook was to be a platform that would connect people everywhere through one digital space. This free service provides a user-friendly opportunity to explore connections and share updates and information with people around the world. Recognizing that Flichy's idea of ideology and myth, is the distortion of the real experience, exposing people to an unrealizable world, Facebook is a perfect exemplification of this concept. Facebook creates a theoretical world where people can connect and communicate regardless of traditional barriers, whether physical, mental of geographical. 

In terms of Flichy's utopia, Facebook exhibits this through many examples. For one, Facebook allows the average person to connect with celebrities or other affluent individuals and feel as though they truly have a connection with them. This utopia is also seen in one’s ability to only showcase the part of their life that they want others to see. People are able to create an identity that they feel reflects their ideal perception. 

All in all, I do not believe Facebook is an example of Tech for Good seeing as there are so many ways one can navigate Facebook in order to use it in unethical and unexpected ways. I also believe that due to the vast amount of money available through Facebook, it poses significant conflict of interest when it comes to truly doing something for the good of people. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

(Un)Happiness and Network Sociality

Changing Times in Ontario's Tech Ecology

Blog Post 2